Edit: Can you believe it, how embarrassing! When I opened the magazine, I somehow managed to open it to page 21, not page 2. I didn’t notice until I received a comment from the magazine, and they mentioned some pieces in the comments, that I didn’t remember seeing. I went back, reopened it, and lo and behold, there they were. Shame on me for not noticing MY USER ERROR! I’ll be looking at the first 20 pages and commenting in another post. I apologize and truly, it was a simple error that caused me to overlook the beginning. (Deb/edited June 13)
Start original article:
Blogger and Podcaster’s June issue is heavy on the podcast front, as the first half of the magazine is devoted to podcasting. There were some pieces of useful information in an interview that suggest ways of increasing traffic on the blog front.
I’m in the middle of the magazine at this point, and am hoping there will be more information geared to the blogger as well. Ahh, I’ve come to an article on stats that discusses how to interpret stats and how to use them to help you better market. Unfortunately again, the article is slanted for the podcaster, rather than the regular text blogger. It’s about downloads and knowing how many people are listening.
Coming up to pages 42 and 43, there hasn’t been much directed at me the blogger. Sure I can read and learn about podcasting as well, but a magazine called Bloggers and Podcasters, you’d think would show an even amount of information. I’m also hating that I can’t turn off the audio ads. The ad runs about 30 seconds, and you need to turn down your speaker volume, since they don’t offer an option.
On page 45 is discussion from Miles Durfee, who has started IBNMA, which is an association for bloggers and podcasters and this new media front. They are looking to form an association which preserves integrity, and what I wonder is if their idea of integrity is the same as others. Is there issue with paid blogging, or is that considered unpure? I notice one of the comments on the article discusses wanting to keep the medium “pure”…and there are different definitions floating around the internet, of what people call pure and what others call making extra money. Some would call pure as elite, and I do hope that this isn’t an angle the association will be aiming for. I hope pure means clean, not elite. I do hope to support them, so I will watch to see where they go with this. I think the idea behind education is a great one, and helping bloggers and podcasters learn more, express ideas and offer research and opportunities to connect and discuss where the future of this media is headed is a good one. This one page article, was the only thing aimed at me, the blogger. How sad, though nice article from Miles.
An interview and a list of advertisers, and as a blogger, I’m not addressed in this issue. While I think a feature focus episode is fine, I think you’ve just alienated and said that for the entire month of June’s issue, we have not spoken to the blogger, but only the podcaster this time. I had really hoped for a little bit of content to dig into, as I so enjoyed the previous issue. I’m disappointed in this issue, and would have been upset had I paid for the print and paper version, being totally overlooked. This was a free digital version, so all I’ve lost is a little time. While I support this magazine, I hope there will be more balance in the future.